<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where the Bloody Social Streams Meet – A New Dam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bournesocial.com/2010/07/26/where-the-bloody-social-rivers-meet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bournesocial.com/2010/07/26/where-the-bloody-social-rivers-meet/</link>
	<description>Where personal and professional branding meet. We are all born social.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:15:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bournesocial</title>
		<link>http://bournesocial.com/2010/07/26/where-the-bloody-social-rivers-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>bournesocial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bournesocial.com/?p=778#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your feedback, Christine. What do you think is the best benefit for brands using Awareness? Would it be the ability to pinpoint which individuals are engaging with brands most and determine in which channels to ID the influencers touching your brand? Or is it making posting across multiple social sites turnkey? Or, is it measuring the engagement of consumers and reach of various messages? I don&#039;t think anyone has solved workflow AND measurement in social media. A message that Awareness may allow you to broadcast across multiple social sites may be counterintuitive when each site requires a nuanced approach. Is something lost when brands just push one button to launch a message across multiple platforms, when the work of finding influencers within a network, via friend-ing them in Flickr for instance, requires an act within the network? In other words, you are streamlining push of messages, but what about managing a YouTube in-box, a discussion in Facebook, and discussion in Flickr? All different forms of communication, none of which could be made turnkey because of the one-to-one nature of the communication?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your feedback, Christine. What do you think is the best benefit for brands using Awareness? Would it be the ability to pinpoint which individuals are engaging with brands most and determine in which channels to ID the influencers touching your brand? Or is it making posting across multiple social sites turnkey? Or, is it measuring the engagement of consumers and reach of various messages? I don&#39;t think anyone has solved workflow AND measurement in social media. A message that Awareness may allow you to broadcast across multiple social sites may be counterintuitive when each site requires a nuanced approach. Is something lost when brands just push one button to launch a message across multiple platforms, when the work of finding influencers within a network, via friend-ing them in Flickr for instance, requires an act within the network? In other words, you are streamlining push of messages, but what about managing a YouTube in-box, a discussion in Facebook, and discussion in Flickr? All different forms of communication, none of which could be made turnkey because of the one-to-one nature of the communication?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Major</title>
		<link>http://bournesocial.com/2010/07/26/where-the-bloody-social-rivers-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bournesocial.com/?p=778#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention of Awareness, Inc. Michael! We definitely appreciate it and love the battlefield metaphor to describe the war between the brands and the consumer. Clever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The amount of content being generated these days is overwhelming and, we have learned through research reports from groups such as Altimeter with their Engagement db report, that in order to reach a wider audience, brands need to engage in multiple social channels. The problem is that as these brands add additional channels, they struggle to scale and manage it all.  Tools like The Awareness Social Marketing Hub address these challenges by providing a way to centralize all their social channels in one location so that enterprise brands can easily publish, manage, and measure all their marketing activities across key social media channels, and then engage with all the comments and conversations taking place around that content. To address your comment around our pricing model, you are correct, the Hub is an enterprise-grade application capable of addressing their unique challenges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention of Awareness, Inc. Michael! We definitely appreciate it and love the battlefield metaphor to describe the war between the brands and the consumer. Clever.</p>
<p>The amount of content being generated these days is overwhelming and, we have learned through research reports from groups such as Altimeter with their Engagement db report, that in order to reach a wider audience, brands need to engage in multiple social channels. The problem is that as these brands add additional channels, they struggle to scale and manage it all.  Tools like The Awareness Social Marketing Hub address these challenges by providing a way to centralize all their social channels in one location so that enterprise brands can easily publish, manage, and measure all their marketing activities across key social media channels, and then engage with all the comments and conversations taking place around that content. To address your comment around our pricing model, you are correct, the Hub is an enterprise-grade application capable of addressing their unique challenges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bournesocial</title>
		<link>http://bournesocial.com/2010/07/26/where-the-bloody-social-rivers-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>bournesocial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bournesocial.com/?p=778#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Margaret, thanks for your feedback on JitterJam and how you view your company. Not over-extending my mixed metaphor of battlefields and dams, I do think that your service and others like it are like a dam in that you take the overwhelming amount of information coming from consumers directed downriver toward brands, and like a dam, you filter through that information flow, and generate power from it. Whether those consumers are riding kayaks, water skis or tugboats as their social platforms, you know how to collect them and relate to them as individuals irrespective of the way they travel to you (and the brands on the other side of the dam). Also, while I think that there is a battlefield today where both brands and individuals are meeting on a muddy pitch to interact with each other (at the intersection of the social streams), this is more like touch football than mortal combat. But, there are rules to play by no matter how serious the game. I&#039;m very interested in your posting here about what sets you apart from Awareness as a contender for filter/workflow vendor world champion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Margaret, thanks for your feedback on JitterJam and how you view your company. Not over-extending my mixed metaphor of battlefields and dams, I do think that your service and others like it are like a dam in that you take the overwhelming amount of information coming from consumers directed downriver toward brands, and like a dam, you filter through that information flow, and generate power from it. Whether those consumers are riding kayaks, water skis or tugboats as their social platforms, you know how to collect them and relate to them as individuals irrespective of the way they travel to you (and the brands on the other side of the dam). Also, while I think that there is a battlefield today where both brands and individuals are meeting on a muddy pitch to interact with each other (at the intersection of the social streams), this is more like touch football than mortal combat. But, there are rules to play by no matter how serious the game. I&#39;m very interested in your posting here about what sets you apart from Awareness as a contender for filter/workflow vendor world champion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://bournesocial.com/2010/07/26/where-the-bloody-social-rivers-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bournesocial.com/?p=778#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words about JitterJam, Michael! We&#039;re glad you like our application!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that brands are not trying just to dam the social streams, but get into the water with their customers and swim with them. Brands no longer have control of the messages out there. The collection of individual thoughts and voices are what&#039;s causing this barrage of conversation, and tools like JitterJam are helping brands go WITH the flow. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There&#039;s no stopping it. There&#039;s no trying to contain it. Playing in the water and engaging those who are there is the first step that brands can take to ensure that this stream doesn&#039;t rush by without the opportunity to participate and to gently nudge those who are engaged towards your banks. It&#039;s there that you can go deeper, gain trust and ensure a happy customer--one who remains loyal to your brand, and better yet, advocates on behalf of your brand in their own, unique voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words about JitterJam, Michael! We&#39;re glad you like our application!</p>
<p>I think that brands are not trying just to dam the social streams, but get into the water with their customers and swim with them. Brands no longer have control of the messages out there. The collection of individual thoughts and voices are what&#39;s causing this barrage of conversation, and tools like JitterJam are helping brands go WITH the flow. </p>
<p>There&#39;s no stopping it. There&#39;s no trying to contain it. Playing in the water and engaging those who are there is the first step that brands can take to ensure that this stream doesn&#39;t rush by without the opportunity to participate and to gently nudge those who are engaged towards your banks. It&#39;s there that you can go deeper, gain trust and ensure a happy customer&#8211;one who remains loyal to your brand, and better yet, advocates on behalf of your brand in their own, unique voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Bloody social streams meet and vendors form the dam -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://bournesocial.com/2010/07/26/where-the-bloody-social-rivers-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Bloody social streams meet and vendors form the dam -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bournesocial.com/?p=778#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Margaret Donnelly, Michael Bourne. Michael Bourne said: Brands &amp; consumers battling for hearts and minds in a social media battle, vendors r new soldiers of fortune http://bit.ly/9of79p [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Margaret Donnelly, Michael Bourne. Michael Bourne said: Brands &amp; consumers battling for hearts and minds in a social media battle, vendors r new soldiers of fortune <a href="http://bit.ly/9of79p" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9of79p</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

